Direct application
The rule is applied once, with the numbers chosen to stay clean. This level answers one question: does the student know which rule this is.
A practice set at a fixed difficulty is wrong for almost everyone almost all of the time. Too easy and it teaches nothing, too hard and it teaches that the subject is not for you. NYGTLYF adjusts inside the session, question by question, and keeps you at the edge of what you can currently do.
These rungs are difficulty levels inside a single concept, climbed in one sitting.
Making the arithmetic uglier is not a harder question, it is a longer one. These four levels change what the student has to work out for themselves.
The rule is applied once, with the numbers chosen to stay clean. This level answers one question: does the student know which rule this is.
The rule still applies once, but something has to be rearranged or a sign has to be handled before it can be used.
The question does not name the method. The student has to recognise the situation and choose the rule themselves.
Two or more mastered concepts have to be combined. This is the level exam questions actually sit at, and the level mastery is measured against.
Two misses at level 3 with the same sign error is exactly the moment a fixed worksheet would have carried on and produced six more failures. Instead the level dropped one step, the same move was rebuilt on cleaner ground at question eight, and level 3 was reached again two minutes later.
Adaptive systems feel arbitrary when the thresholds are hidden. These are ours.
Not two, because two can be luck. Not five, because five at a level you have already cleared is the boredom that ends study sessions.
One miss is noise and the level holds. The same class of error repeated is a signal that the level above your current grip was reached too early.
A correct answer that took four minutes at level 2 is treated differently from one that took forty seconds. Struggle is recorded even when the answer is right.
Accuracy at level 1 barely moves the mastery figure. The bar can only be crossed with work at levels 3 and 4, so a rung cannot be cleared by staying comfortable.
If accuracy alone decided mastery, the optimal strategy would be to answer easy questions forever. Weighting fixes that. Level 1 accuracy contributes very little, level 4 contributes most, and the bar is placed where it cannot be reached without doing work at the level exam questions actually sit at.
The practical effect is that a rung turning mint means something specific: you handled that concept inside multi concept questions, more than once, on days that were not the same day.
Difficulty adapts to keep you working just above comfortable. That is a deliberately slightly unpleasant place to be, and it is the only place practice actually changes anything.
Most students place themselves a level higher than the evidence does, and a level lower than they are capable of reaching by the end of the session. Both of those are worth knowing tonight.
Free tier stays free. One subject, a daily doubt limit, no card.